I’ve been watching the EURO 2016 game between Croatia and Turkey today. I’ve good friends in Croatia and in the Balkan region that have Croatian roots – so I wanted to share the moment with them. Croatia played well and won the game but a different news story overshadowed everything else: England and Russia have been given disqualification warnings.
Just a few minutes ago, Swedish TV SVT1, the BBC and other EURO 2016 broadcasters reported that the UEFA Executive Committee has issued a warning directed at the Russian and English football associations, after violence in Marseille during the recent days. UEFA, European football’s governing body, said in a press release:
The UEFA Executive Committee would like to express its disgust at the violent clashes which occurred in the city of Marseille. Such unacceptable behaviour by so-called supporters of the national teams of England and Russia has no place in football, a sport we must protect and defend. The UEFA Executive Committee has warned both football associations that – irrespective of any decisions taken by the independent disciplinary bodies relating to incidents inside the stadium – it will not hesitate to impose additional sanctions on the Football Association (FA) and the Russian Football Union (RFS), including the potential disqualification of their respective teams from the tournament, should such violence occur again.”
This strongly-worded statement is a big deal. It’s a big deal for what it says and it is a big deal for what it does not say.
UEFA holds the football associations, and quintessentially also the respective national teams, accountable for the behavior of their “fans”. Reports say that Marseille, the city where the England-Russia football game took place, has been shaken by violent clashes between French youth, Russian, and English supporters and the French police and security forces. UEFA makes clear that it will not hesitate to take the most far-reaching measures in order to stop and eliminate the violence. I applaud them for what they have said now.
Calling it, what it is
But I also have to say that more could have and should have been done to prevent this violence. But what? Let’s look at the elephant in the room and call UEFA actions what they are. The BBC writes:
In the steamy, humid environment of this port city, with alcohol flowing freely, all the ingredients were in place for events that unfolded in the Vieux-Port de Marseille.”
In another article by BBC writer Ben Mundy reports:
There was a heavy police presence and at one point officers asked a bar to stop serving alcohol …”
Violence in the city days before the match. Violence inside the stadium right after the match. Reporting on the violence inside the stadium, the Independent’s Mark Ogden asked:
Where were the police inside the stadium? Why was more not done to influence an alcohol ban ahead of such a potentially-volatile fixture? And why was the segregation in Stade Velodrome so obviously inadequate before the trouble erupted at the end of the game?”
And the Herald Scotland reported that Samia Ghali, a Marseille senator, said:
When you see drunken hooligans hurling bottles, I think you realise that it’s necessary to impose restrictions on the sale of alcohol to make it easier to maintain order.”
On Twitter, Martin Fricker, a Daily Mirror senior reporter, delivers news from Marseille and this picture struck me.
This pretty much sums up the day (top snap by Getty’s @Carl_Court) … #EURO2016 #ENG #RUS pic.twitter.com/5EdV6YJUXS
— Martin Fricker (@martinfricker) June 11, 2016
In this picture, a lot is going on. But at center stage, too, is beer..
Lot’s of alcohol.
Lot’s of green bottles…
That’s what Carlsberg and the UEFA Euro 2016 twitter actiicites look like. And this is an example of what it looks like in every single game, frequently…
Pervasive alcohol marketing. Perverse alcohol norm
Alcohol is everywhere. When the biggest stars give interviews about their performance right after the game, Carlsberg is there. When the biggest stars celebrate their goals, Carlsberg is there. In the beginning, in the middle and in the end of games, Carlsberg is there. And Carlsberg profits from it. And so does UEFA. In the words of Mark Ogden:
It was Uefa and Marseille’s job to be ready for the game, but both were patently unprepared…”
Football is not for hooligans and thugs. No question about it. And no question about this fact either: alcohol does NOT cause violence. But it is also high-time for UEFA and other football governing bodies and associations, and for our politicians and decision-makers to end the romance with alcohol companies.
The alcohol norm in football is perverse. Together with the pervasive alcohol marketing it fuels violence. Let’s call it what it is: UEFA (and others) have to quit putting their profits over the well-being of children and families, fans and football itself. The events these days involving alcohol fueled violence should cause an urgent disqualification warning to Carlsberg as well.
Like at the Fifa World Cup in Brazil, where violence erupted, after alcohol sales were re-introduced, EURO 2016 is sadly another example where we can clearly see that the alcohol norm needs to be disqualified.
For more evidence
- about how harmful alcohol sports sponsorship is to kids, click here: Big Alcohol Exposed
- about how pervasive alcohol brands are in sports in particular and in the lives of children and youth in general, click here: Collection of unethical marketing cases.
Take action now
to help end the harmful practices of the alcohol industry in football, click here: #OutbidChang
How about an update on this including the Croatian fans themselves and their behaviour?