Scientific Article
Privatizing Government Alcohol Retail Monopolies Causes Substantial Adverse Consequences For Public Health And Safety

Tim Stockwell (E-mail: Sherk, Thor Norström, Colin Angus, Mats Ramstedt, Sven Andréasson, Tanya Chikritzhs, Johanna Gripenberg, Harold Holder, John Holmes and Pia Mäkelä
Stockwell et al. Estimating the public health impact of disbanding a government alcohol monopoly: application of new methods to the case of Sweden. BMC Public Health (2018) 18:1400
  • Source
    BMC Public Health
  • Release date

Estimating the public health impact of disbanding a government alcohol monopoly: application of new methods to the case of Sweden

Research Article



Government alcohol monopolies were created in North America and Scandinavia to limit health and social problems. The Swedish monopoly, Systembolaget, reports to a health ministry and controls the sale of all alcoholic beverages with > 3.5% alcohol/volume for off-premise consumption, within a public health mandate. Elsewhere, alcohol monopolies are being dismantled with evidence of increased consumption and harms. The researchers describe innovative modelling techniques to estimate health outcomes in scenarios involving Systembolaget being replaced by

  1. privately owned liquor stores, or
  2. alcohol sales in grocery stores.

The methods employed can be applied in other jurisdictions and for other policy changes.


Impacts of the privatisation scenarios on pricing, outlet density, trading hours, advertising and marketing were estimated based on Swedish expert opinion and published evidence. Systematic reviews were conducted to estimate impacts on alcohol consumption in each scenario.

Two methods were applied to estimate harm impacts: (i) alcohol attributable morbidity and mortality were estimated utilising the International Model of Alcohol Harms and Policies (InterMAHP); (ii) ARIMA methods to estimate the relationship between per capita alcohol consumption and specific types of alcohol-related mortality and crime.


Replacing government stores with private liquor stores (Scenario 1) led to a 20.0% increase in per capita consumption.

Replacement with grocery stores (Scenario 2) led to a 31.2% increase.

With InterMAHP there were 763 or + 47% and 1234 or + 76% more deaths per year, for Scenarios 1 and 2 respectively.

With ARIMA, there were 850 more deaths per year in Scenario 1 and 1418 more in Scenario 2. InterMAHP also estimated 10,859 or + 29% and 16,118 or + 42% additional hospital stays per year respectively.


There would be substantial adverse consequences for public health and safety were Systembolaget to be privatised. Both privatisation scenarios resulted in substantial increases in alcohol consumption, attributable crime, hospitalisation and death, the largest increase was estimated for the sale of alcohol in grocery stores.

Confidence in this conclusion is supported by the degree of convergence in the estimates of increased harm from two quite different theoretical and methodological approaches.

The scientists also conclude that improved health and safety outcomes could be achieved were Systembolaget to introduce still stronger policies, especially in the area of alcohol pricing.

With increasing trends towards privatisation of alcohol control and distributions systems in North America, these estimates may also be a cautionary tale for policy makers in other full or partial alcohol monopoly jurisdictions. Increased government control over the distribution and sale of alcohol is also an option for countries with fully privatised systems to consider as an effective means of reducing alcohol-related harms.

Source Website: BMC Public Health