The economic analysis found that scaling up clinical interventions that target CVD, diabetes, and mental health disorders, and policy measures that target tobacco and alcohol use, would save over 6,600 lives between 2017–2032, and avert JMD 81.3 billion (USD 640 million) in direct and indirect economic costs that result from mortality and morbidity linked to NCDs…

Author

Brian Hutchinson (email: bhutchinson@rti.org), Roy Small, Kofi Acquah, Rosa Sandoval, Rachel Nugent, Delia Itziar Belausteguigoitia, Nicholas Banatvala, Douglas Webb, Dudley Tarlton, Alexey Kulikov, Elisa Prieto, Karin Santi

Citation

Hutchinson, B., Small, R., Acquah, K., Sandoval, R., Nugent, R., Belausteguigoitia, D., Banatvala, N., Webb, D., Tarlton, D., Kulikov, A., Prieto, E. and Santi, K. (2019). The investment case as a mechanism for addressing the NCD burden: Evaluating the NCD institutional context in Jamaica, and the return on investment of select interventions. PLOS ONE, 14(10), p.e0223412.


Source
PLOS One
Release date
04/10/2019

The Investment Case as a Mechanism for Addressing the NCD Burden: Evaluating the NCD Institutional Context in Jamaica, and the Return on Investment of Select Interventions

Research article

Abstract

Introduction

Noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) are a broad challenge for decision-makers. NCDs account for seven out of every 10 deaths globally, with 42 percent occurring prematurely in individuals under age 70. Despite their heavy toll, NCDs are underfunded, with only around two percent of global funding dedicated to the disease set. Country governments are responsible for funding targeted actions to reduce the NCD burden, but among other priorities, many have yet to invest in the health-system interventions and policy measures that can reduce the burden. This article examines “investment cases” as a potential mechanism for catalyzing attention to—and funding for—NCDs.

Method

In Jamaica, using the UN inter-agency OneHealth Tool, the researchers conducted an economic analysis to estimate the return-on-investment from scaling up strategic clinical interventions, and from implementing or intensifying policy measures that target NCD risk factors. In addition, the researchers conducted an institutional and context (ICA) analysis, interviewing stakeholders across sectors to take stock of promising policy pathways (e.g., areas of general consensus, political appetite and opportunity) as well as challenges to implementation.

Results and conclusion

The economic analysis found that scaling up clinical interventions that target CVD, diabetes, and mental health disorders, and policy measures that target tobacco and alcohol use, would save over 6,600 lives between 2017–2032, and avert JMD 81.3 billion (USD 640 million) in direct and indirect economic costs that result from mortality and morbidity linked to NCDs. The ICA uncovered government economic growth targets and social priorities that would be aided by increased attention to NCDs, and it linked these targets and priorities to the economic analysis.


Source Website: PLOS One