Existing frameworks that guide the regulation and distribution of alcohol frequently focus on maximising the contribution of the alcohol sector to the economy, but should also take into account the associated economic, social and health costs. Current interventions do not systematically address the most important causes of harm from alcohol, and need to be informed by reliable evidence of the ongoing costs of alcohol-related harms…

Author

Richard Gregory Matzopoulos (email: richard.matzopoulos@mrc.ac.za), Sarah Truen, Brett Bowman and Joanne Corrigall

Citation

Matzopoulos, R. G., Truen, S., Bowman, B., and Corigall, J. (2014) South African Medical Journal;104(2):127-132. DOI:10.7196/SAMJ.7644


Source
The South African Medical Journal
Release date
28/02/2014

Research article

The Cost of Harmful Alcohol Use in South Africa

Abstract

Background

The economic, social and health costs associated with alcohol-related harms are important measures with which to inform alcohol management policies and laws. This analysis builds on previous cost estimates for South Africa.

Methods

The researchers reviewed existing international best-practice costing frameworks to provide the costing definitions and dimensions. The researchers sourced data from South African costing literature or, if unavailable, estimated costs using socio-economic and health data from secondary sources. Care was taken to avoid possible causes of cost overestimation, in particular double counting and, as far as possible, second-round effects of alcohol abuse.

Results

The combined total tangible and intangible costs of alcohol harm to the economy were estimated at 10 – 12% of the 2009 gross domestic product (GDP). The tangible financial cost of harmful alcohol use alone was estimated at R37.9 billion, or 1.6% of the 2009 GDP.

Discussion

The costs of alcohol-related harms provide a substantial counterbalance to the economic benefits highlighted by the alcohol industry to counter stricter regulation. Curtailing these costs by regulatory and policy interventions contributes directly and indirectly to social well-being and the economy.

Conclusions

Existing frameworks that guide the regulation and distribution of alcohol frequently focus on maximising the contribution of the alcohol sector to the economy, but should also take into account the associated economic, social and health costs. Current interventions do not systematically address the most important causes of harm from alcohol, and need to be informed by reliable evidence of the ongoing costs of alcohol-related harms.


Source Website: SAMJ