This evaluation found that the local ordinance in Baltimore City which prevents underage youth from making any purchase in liquor stores were largely not implemented by stores. The noncompliance rate was 68.1%.

This evaluation demonstrates that, in the absence of enforcement, ordinances are neither likely to be honored nor to achieve the intended public health benefits.

Author

dam J. Milam (email: amilam3@jhu.edu), Debra M. Furr-Holden, Elizabeth D. Nesoff and Pamela J. Trangenstein

Citation

Milam, A., Furr-Holden, C., Nesoff, E. and Trangenstein, P., 2021. Evaluation of a Local Ordinance to Prevent Any Underage Purchases in Liquor Stores: The Need for Enforcement. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 82(2), pp.219-227.


Source
Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs
Release date
07/04/2021

Evaluation of a Local Ordinance to Prevent Any Underage Purchases in Liquor Stores: The Need for Enforcement

Abstract

Objective

In June 2012, Baltimore City, MD, enacted legislation (commonly referred to as the Mosby Bill) prohibiting all liquor stores (outlets that primarily sell alcoholic beverages) from selling “any food, goods, wares, supplies, or other merchandise to any person under the age of 18.” Three years after enactment, this study evaluated the impact of this legislation on non-alcohol product sales among youth.

Method

Research assistants (RAs) ages 16–20 were trained in using a standardized observational tool to quantify and record characteristics of the outlets, including products sold. A trained pair comprising one RA age 16 to 20 and one RA exactly age 18 were sent into every liquor store (i.e., packaged goods stores and bar/taverns with packaged goods sales) in Baltimore to conduct the assessment and make a non-alcohol purchase. Since the research was not conducted in concert with the police, the 18-year-old RA made the purchase attempt while the other (age 16 to 20) RA completed the assessment.

Results

Purchase attempts were made at 502 liquor stores, and 352 of those attempts were successful (able to make purchase without being asked for identification or age; noncompliance rate = 68.1%). Noncompliance was highest among packaged goods stores compared with bar/taverns, and in neighborhoods with a lower median household income and a higher proportion of African American residents (p < .050). Noncompliant outlets were also located closer to public schools (p < .050).

Conclusions

This evaluation demonstrates that, in the absence of enforcement, ordinances are neither likely to be honored nor to achieve the intended public health benefits.


Source Website: JSAD