This review found that peer-led interventions may be effective in preventing alcohol, tobacco and possibly cannabis use among adolescents.

The evidence base is limited and needs further research.


Georgie J. MacArthur (email:, Sean Harrison, Deborah M. Caldwell, Matthew Hickman, Rona Campbell


MacArthur, G. J., Harrison, S., Caldwell, D. M., Hickman, M., and Campbell, R. (2016) Peer-led interventions to prevent tobacco, alcohol and/or drug use among young people aged 11–21 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction, 111: 391– 407. doi: 10.1111/add.13224.

Release date

Peer-Led Interventions to Prevent Tobacco, Alcohol and/or Drug Use Among Young People Aged 11–21 Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis


Background and Aims

Peer-led interventions may offer a beneficial approach in preventing substance use, but their impact has not yet been quantified. The present researchers conducted a systematic review to investigate and quantify the effect of peer-led interventions that sought to prevent tobacco, alcohol and/or drug use among young people aged 11–21 years.


Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ERIC and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to July 2015 without language restriction. The researchers included randomized controlled trials only. Screening and data extraction were conducted in duplicate and data from eligible studies were pooled in a random effects meta-analysis.


This review identified 17 eligible studies, approximately half of which were school-based studies targeting tobacco use among adolescents. Ten studies targeting tobacco use could be pooled, representing 13,706 young people in 220 schools. Meta-analysis demonstrated that the odds of smoking were lower among those receiving the peer-led intervention compared with control [odds ratio (OR) = 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.62–0.99, P = 0.040]. There was evidence of heterogeneity (I2 = 41%, χ2 15.17, P = 0.086). Pooling of six studies representing 1699 individuals in 66 schools demonstrated that peer-led interventions were also associated with benefit in relation to alcohol use (OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.65–0.99, P = 0.036), while three studies (n = 976 students in 38 schools) suggested an association with lower odds of cannabis use (OR = 0.70, 0.50–0.97, P = 0.034). No studies were found that targeted other illicit drug use.


Peer interventions may be effective in preventing tobacco, alcohol and possibly cannabis use among adolescents, although the evidence base is limited overall, and is characterized mainly by small studies of low quality.

Source Website: Wiley Online Library