This review showed that remotely delivered alcohol and substance misuse interventions can be effective and highlighted a range of behavior change techniques (BCTs) that showed promise for improving services. However, concerns with the risk of bias and the potential of promise ratios to inflate effectiveness warrant caution in interpreting the evidence.

Author

Neil Howlett (email: n.howlett@herts.ac.uk), Jaime García-Iglesias, Charis Bontoft, Gavin Breslin, Suzanne Bartington, Imogen Freethy, Monica Huerga-Malillos, Julia Jones, Nigel Lloyd, Tony Marshall, Stefanie Williams, Wendy Wills and Katherine Brown

Citation

Howlett, N., García-Iglesias, J., Bontoft, C., Breslin, G., Bartington, S., Freethy, I., Huerga-Malillos, M., Jones, J., Lloyd, N., Marshall, T., Williams, S., Wills, W. and Brown, K., 2022. A systematic review and behaviour change technique analysis of remotely delivered alcohol and/or substance misuse interventions for adults. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 239, p.109597.


Source
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Release date
08/08/2022

A Systematic Review and Behaviour Change Technique Analysis of Remotely Delivered Alcohol And/or Substance Misuse Interventions for Adults

Abstract

Background

There has been a lack of systematic exploration of remotely delivered intervention content and its effectiveness for behavior change outcomes. This review provides a synthesis of the behavior change techniques (BCT) contained in remotely delivered alcohol and/or substance misuse approaches and their association with intervention promise.

Methods

Searches in MEDLINE, Scopus, PsycINFO (ProQuest), and the Cochrane Library, included studies reporting remote interventions focusing on alcohol and/or substance misuse among adults, with a primary behavior change outcome (e.g., alcohol levels consumed). Assessment of risk of bias, study promise, and BCT coding was conducted. Synthesis focussed on the association of BCTs with intervention effectiveness using promise ratios.

Results

Studies targeted alcohol misuse (52 studies) or substance misuse (10 studies), with predominantly randomised controlled trial designs and asynchronous digital approaches. For alcohol misuse studies, 16 were very promising, 17 were quite promising, and 13 were not promising. Of the 36 eligible BCTs, 28 showed potential promise, with seven of these only appearing in very or quite promising studies. Particularly promising BCTs were ‘Avoidance/reducing exposure to cues for behaviour’, ‘Pros and cons’ and ‘Self-monitoring of behaviour’. For substance misuse studies, three were very promising and six were quite promising, with all 12 BCTs showing potential promise.

Conclusions

This review showed that remotely delivered alcohol and substance misuse interventions can be effective and highlighted a range of BCTs that showed promise for improving services. However, concerns with the risk of bias and the potential of promise ratios to inflate effectiveness warrant caution in interpreting the evidence.


Source Website: Science Direct