This study tested the effectiveness of a military-focused screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) intervention for reducing risky alcohol use among active-duty patients.

Results of a complete case analysis showed significant reduction in alcohol consumption following SBIRT intervention.

The authors suggest future SBIRT effectiveness trials should also test electronic SBIRT intervention approaches.

Author

Mark B. Reed (email:mreed@sdsu.edu), Susan I. Woodruff, Capt. Gerard DeMers, Capt. Michael Matteucci, Sarah J. Chavez, Megan Hellner, and Suzanne L. Hurtado

Citation

Reed, M., Woodruff, S., DeMers, G., Matteucci, M., Chavez, S., Hellner, M. and Hurtado, S., 2021. Results of a Randomized Trial of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) to Reduce Alcohol Misuse Among Active-Duty Military Personnel. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 82(2), pp.269-278.


Source
Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs
Release date
07/04/2021

Results of a Randomized Trial of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) to Reduce Alcohol Misuse Among Active-Duty Military Personnel

Abstract

Objective

Rates of heavy alcohol use among active-duty military personnel in the United States are high and negatively affect individuals within the service branches. This study tested the effectiveness of a military-focused screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) intervention for reducing risky alcohol use among active-duty patients.

Method

The study used a randomized, parallel, two-group design to test the effectiveness of the SBIRT intervention in a convenience sample of service members recruited from the emergency department of a military hospital. A total of 791 participants were randomized to the SBIRT or usual care conditions, and 472 participants (59.7%) completed a 6-month follow-up. Fifteen percent of the sample was female. Self-reported Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), controlled drinking [alcohol use] self-efficacy (CDSE), and readiness to change alcohol use behaviors were assessed at baseline and follow-up.

Results

Among higher risk participants (i.e., AUDIT ≥8), results of a complete case analysis showed a significant reduction in scores on the AUDIT-C (consumption questions from the AUDIT) and a significant increase in CDSE. Null findings were observed for intent-to-treat analyses testing the effectiveness of the SBIRT intervention; significant decreases in AUDIT and AUDIT-C scores and significant increases in CDSE were observed over time, irrespective of condition assignment for both complete case and intent-to-treat analyses.

Conclusions

Results of a complete case analysis provided some support for the effectiveness of the SBIRT intervention for higher risk participants. The results of the more conservative intent-to-treat analyses did not support any of the study hypotheses. Future SBIRT effectiveness trials should also test electronic SBIRT intervention approaches.


Source Website: JSAD