Collectively, the research shows that alcohol policy making has involved a contest between the research community and alcohol industry actors about whether and how science should be used to inform policy.

The authors conclude that advances in alcohol policy should be underpinned by strong, reflexive public health sciences, alert to the role of industry in the alcohol harms under study, and thorough in their investigation of the alcohol industry as an object of research in itself.

Author

Jim McCambridge, Gemma Mitchell, Matthew Lesch (email: matt.lesch@york.ac.uk), Andreas Filippou, Su Golder, Jack Garry, Andrew Bartlett and Mary Madden

Citation

McCambridge, J., Mitchell, G., Lesch, M., Filippou, A., Golder, S., Garry, J., Bartlett, A., and Madden, M. (2022) The emperor has no clothes: a synthesis of findings from the Transformative Research on the Alcohol industry, Policy and Science research programme, Addiction. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16058.


Source
Addiction
Release date
04/10/2022

The Emperor Has No Clothes: A Synthesis of Findings From the Transformative Research on the Alcohol Industry, Policy and Science Research Program

Abstract

Background and Aims

The Transformative Research on the Alcohol industry, Policy and Science (TRAPS) program investigates the alcohol industry, with an innovative focus on public health sciences. TRAPS adds to an under-developed literature on the study of alcohol industry influence on alcohol policy making. This paper provides a synthesis of TRAPS findings to inform future research.

Methods

The researchers conducted an interpretive review of TRAPS research findings across its component studies, identifying and integrating the key contributions made by individual studies to the literature on alcohol policy making and science, and identifying areas where TRAPS progress was limited. This produced themes for consideration in future research agenda setting.

Results

TRAPS research explored the intervention of the alcohol industry in science and policy making using various methods, including systematic reviews, qualitative interviews, and network analysis. These studies identified the industry’s political activities in several key areas, such as the debate over minimum unit pricing (MUP), cardiovascular health and alcohol research, and a long-running public relations program developed in close connection with the tobacco industry. Collectively, the research shows that alcohol policy making has involved a contest between the research community and alcohol industry actors about whether and how science should be used to inform policy.

Conclusions

The Transformative Research on the Alcohol industry, Policy and Science (TRAPS) program demonstrates the need for a transdisciplinary approach to understand the nature of corporate political activity; the crucial role industry involvement in science plays in the development of corporate political power; and how public health actors have successfully overcome industry opposition to evidence-based policies.

Advances in alcohol policy should be underpinned by strong, reflexive public health sciences, alert to the role of industry in the alcohol harms under study, and thorough in their investigation of the alcohol industry as an object of research in itself.


Source Website: Wiley Online Library