To inform the development of regulatory strategies, it is important to understand how alcohol branding interacts with seductive pricing strategies to influence purchasing decisions.

Towards this aim, the current study examines how the ‘decoy effect’ may operate to modify purchasing decisions for branded alcoholic beverages.
The study showed that when faced with a choice conflict, individuals who consume alcohol may be nudged into selecting more expensive branded alcoholic beverages.
These findings may inform the development of alcohol control policies relating to branding and relative pricing/product placement.

Author

Charlotte R Pennington (E-amil: c.pennington@aston.ac.uk), Rebecca L Monk, Adam W Qureshi, Rutuja Kulkarni, Wang Li, Jing Li, Derek Heim

Citation

Pennington CR, Monk RL, Qureshi AW, Kulkarni R, Li W, Li J, Heim D. Dark Nudges: Branding Magnifies the Decoy Effect in Alcohol Purchasing Decisions. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2022 Nov;83(6):857-866. PMID: 36484583.


Source
Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs
Release date
24/08/2022

Dark Nudges: Branding Magnifies the Decoy Effect in Alcohol Purchasing Decisions

Research article

Abstract

Objective

Public health policies aim to reduce alcohol consumption and related harms by controlling the cost and availability of alcohol, yet industry actors seek to position branded beverages appealingly vis-à-vis other products.

To inform the development of regulatory strategies, it is important to understand how alcohol branding interacts with seductive pricing strategies to influence purchasing decisions.

Towards this aim, the current study examines how the ‘decoy effect’ may operate to modify purchasing decisions for branded alcoholic beverages.

Method

Ninety-eight “social alcohol users” completed an online Decoy Assessment, choosing from a range of (non)branded, (non)alcoholic beverage offers based on price and quantity. These initial purchasing decisions were then re-assessed when a decoy product – offering a quantity in between the two original offers but at a significantly higher price – was introduced into the choice array.

Results

The decoy modified initial purchasing decisions for alcoholic compared to non-alcoholic beverages, and this effect was exacerbated by alcohol branding.

Heightened self-reported alcohol consumption was also associated with a greater change from choices for branded alcoholic beverages.

Conclusions

When faced with a choice conflict, individuals who consume alcohol may be nudged into selecting more expensive branded alcoholic beverages.

These findings may inform the development of alcohol control policies relating to branding and relative pricing/product placement.


Source Website: JSAD