Misclassification of former and occasional drinkers as abstainers is widespread in alcohol epidemiology. This practice leads to a systematic underestimation of health risks from alcohol use (e.g. for cancer) and overestimation of health benefits…

Author

Tim Stockwell, Jinhui Zhao

Citation

Stockwell, T., and Zhao, J. (2016) Alcohol's contribution to cancer is underestimated for exactly the same reason that its contribution to cardioprotection is overestimated. Addiction, doi: 10.1111/add.13627.


Source
Addiction
Release date
27/11/2016

Alcohol’s contribution to cancer is underestimated for exactly the same reason that its contribution to cardioprotection is overestimated

Commentary in response to Jennie Connor “Alcohol consumption as a cause of cancer”

Quote

Connor discusses whether it is consistent to doubt epidemiological studies that low-dose alcohol is cardioprotective while accepting similar evidence that it also causes cancer. We show that misclassification of former and occasional drinkers as abstainers is widespread in alcohol epidemiology. This practice leads to a systematic underestimation of health risks from alcohol use (e.g. for cancer) and overestimation of health benefits. Correction of this problem in future studies should lead to significantly larger estimates of alcohol’s contribution to chronic disease.”

For complete commentary

See PDF file below or follow the link to the Addiction Journal.


Source Website: Addiction Journal