This study found that present day risks for exposure to retail alcohol availability were delimited by historic exclusionary land use practices. Current inequitable health risks may be founded on racist spatial projects of past decades.

The results inform policy makers on causes of the unequal alcohol harm on minorities.

Author

Juliet P. Lee (email: jlee@prev.org), William Ponicki, Christina Mair, Paul Gruenewald, LinaGhanem

Citation

Lee, J., Ponicki, W., Mair, C., Gruenewald, P. and Ghanem, L., 2020. What explains the concentration of off-premise alcohol outlets in Black neighborhoods?. SSM - Population Health, 12, p.100669.


Source
SSM - Population Health
Release date
24/09/2020

What Explains the Concentration of Off-Premise Alcohol Outlets in Black Neighborhoods?

Abstract

Introduction

Greater availability of commercial alcohol is associated with increased alcohol use and related public health problems. Greater alcohol outlet density, a marker of alcohol availability, is associated with poorer and predominantly minority neighborhoods. However, poorer populations, African Americans, and Latins report using less alcohol compared to Whites and wealthier groups. This study considers the role of structural racism in the social ecology of alcohol availability. Specifically the researchers examine racist urban land use practices in the USA which became codified in the 1930s through Federal Home Owner Lending Corporation (HOLC) designations for assigning parcel values, known as “redlining.” Redlining demarcated low-density residential zones for wealthy Whites which excluded poor and non-White people as well as certain businesses, including alcohol retailers. The study assessed the impacts of historic redlining on present day risks for exposure to retail alcohol availability in urban Northern California.

Methods

For six contiguous and demographically diverse Northern California cities the researchers obtained digital renderings of HOLC maps (1937) which demarcated exclusions of people and businesses for 119 neighborhood areas across four land valuation zones. The researchers then identified the most prevalent HOLC rating for each of 520 current Census block groups in the six cities, including a residual category for areas not rated by HOLC. They then geolocated all current (2016) off-premise alcohol sales outlets operating in the six cities (N = 401). The study used Bayesian spatial Poisson models to relate current alcohol outlet densities and Census-based estimates of neighborhood characteristics to historic HOLC classifications.

Results

Spatial Poisson analyses found far greater contemporary off-premise outlet densities in the lowest-valued HOLC zones than in the highest (median relative rate [RR] 9.6, 95% CI 4.8–22.1). The lowest-valued HOLC zones were also characterized by far higher current percentages of both Black residents (RR 30.4, 95% CI 17.0–54.6) and Hispanic residents (RR 9.7, 95% CI 7.2–12.9).

Conclusions

Present day risks for exposure to retail alcohol availability were delimited by historic exclusionary land use practices. Current inequitable health risks may be founded on racist spatial projects of past decades.


Source Website: Science Direct